Home › Case law › Paul Kafeero and Anor v Electrol Commision and Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 22 of 2006)
Paul Kafeero and Anor v Electrol Commision and Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 22 of 2006)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 3 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that refusing to register a party named "Kabaka Yekka" was a justified, constitutional limitation as the name risked arousing ethnic divisions.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Paul Kafeero and Anor applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.