Plinth Technical Works Ltd v Mbale Municipal Local Government Council (CAD ARB 61 of 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The tribunal held that the arbitration clause in Clause 25.4 applies to any disputes arising under the contract, not only appeals from adjudicator decisions under Clause 25.3. The settlement agreement dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration clause. The absence of a project manager decision and the project manager's non-participation in the settlement agreement support this construction. Application granted with costs to the applicant.
Outcome
Application to enforce settlement agreement through arbitration granted
Facts
The parties executed a construction contract on 2 June 2014 for road works in Mbale Municipal Local Government Council. A dispute arose and was compromised by a settlement agreement dated 22 August 2017, in which the Council agreed to pay the contractor UGX 1,984,000,000 after verification by the supervising consultant. The settlement agreement was not honored. The applicant sought to enforce the settlement agreement through arbitration. The respondent opposed on grounds that arbitration would disrupt ongoing verification, that the appointing authority under Clause 26 was the Uganda Institute of Professional Engineers, and that no notice of reference to arbitration had been provided.
Issues
- Whether the settlement agreement is envisaged by the arbitration clause in the construction contract.
- Whether the arbitration proceedings would hinder or disrupt the ongoing verification exercise.
- Whether the applicant was required to provide notice of reference to arbitration.
Orders
- Application granted.
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (2)
- Pile Corporation Ltd v Twed Property Development Ltd (CAD ARB 4 of 2018)
- Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc. versus Hindustan Copper Limited, Supreme Court of India
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.