Precision Consulting Communication Ltd v Ex-Ken (U) Limited (Civil Suit No.175 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court entered default judgment for the plaintiff under summary procedure. The defendant failed to file an application for leave to appear and defend within the mandated 10 days. The plaintiff's claim for recovery of a liquidated sum of UGX 260,120,000 under a written agreement for delivery of face masks satisfied the requirements of Order 36 rule 2(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Outcome
Default judgment entered for plaintiff for failure of defendant to apply for leave to defend
Facts
The plaintiff instituted a summary suit seeking recovery of UGX 260,120,000 under an agreement for delivery of face masks. The suit was brought under Order 36 rules 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The defendant was served but did not file an application for leave to appear and defend within the mandated 10-day period as required under Order 36. The plaintiff's claim was for a liquidated sum based on a written contract.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff's claim satisfied the requirements for summary procedure under Order 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- Whether default judgment should be entered against the defendant for failure to apply for leave to appear and defend.
Orders
- Default judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant.
- Defendant to pay the plaintiff UGX 260,120,000.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Cases cited (1)
- Sterling Travel and Tour Services Ltd v Millennium Travel Tours Services Ltd (HCMA No. 116 of 2013)
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.