Prof. Mugisha Anthony v Makerere University Council and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 0203 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application for temporary injunction dismissed. The court held that the applicant failed to establish a serious question to be tried where the Inspector General of Government had investigated and recommended a fresh recruitment process, and the University Council acting within its statutory powers under the Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act had declared the position vacant. The applicant also failed to demonstrate irreparable injury that could not be compensated by damages.
Outcome
Application for temporary injunction dismissed with directions for expeditious disposal of the main suit
Facts
Prof. Mugisha Anthony competed for the position of Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Finance & Administration) at Makerere University following an advertisement in February 2024. Three candidates were shortlisted and the University Senate conducted elections. Prof. Mugisha polled the most votes and was recommended for appointment by Makerere University Council. Another candidate, Prof. Alinaitwe Mwanaki Henry, petitioned the Council alleging unfairness in the recruitment process. The Council decided to repeat the recruitment process and advertised the position in March 2025. On 3rd April 2025, the Inspector General of Government halted the recruitment process pending investigations. Following investigations, the IGG set aside the recruitment process that had begun in February 2024 and recommended commencement of a fresh recruitment process. Prof. Mugisha applied for a temporary injunction to restrain the University from repeating the recruitment process.
Issues
- Whether the application satisfies the conditions for grant of an order of temporary injunction.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the main suit.
- Respondents to file their reply by 2nd February 2026.
- Applicant to file affidavit in rejoinder (if any) by 5th February 2026.
- Applicant to file written submissions by 5th February 2026.
- Respondents to file written submissions by 9th February 2026.
- Applicant to file submissions in rejoinder (if any) by 12th February 2026.
- Ruling of the main suit to be delivered via ECCMIS by 28th February 2026.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Judicature Act Cap. 16 s.42(1)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap. 282 s.64(c)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 41 rule 1
- Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act Cap. 262 s.40(1)
- Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act Cap. 262 s.50
Cases cited (3)
- Shiv Construction Co. Ltd v Endesha Enterprises Limited (Civil Appeal No. 34 of 1992)
- Kiyimba Kaggwa v. Katende Abdu Nasser [1985] HCB 43
- American Cyanamid Co v. Ethicon Ltd [1975] 1 All ER 505
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.