Quininto Etum v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 19 of 1989)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the defence of accident was unavailable where a dying declaration, corroborated by the accused's conduct of chasing, beating and hiding the spear, proved a deliberate killing.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Quininto Etum applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.