Ramadhani v Tanzania (Application No. 010-2015)
African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
· [2019] AfCHPR 30
· 2019
Proceedings Reopened
AI-generated summary
↓ Download
Pin to watchlist
Add to matter
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Outcome
Reparations proceedings reopened to allow consideration of respondent's late-filed response
Orders
- Proceedings in Application 010/2015 Amir Ramadhani v. United Republic of Tanzania (Reparations) are hereby reopened.
- Respondent State's Response to the Applicant's submissions on reparations is deemed as properly filed, in the interest of justice.
- Applicant to submit his Reply to the Respondent State's Response within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.
Ramadhani v Tanzania (Application No. 010-2015) [2019] AfCHPR 30 (7 August 2019)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan
judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.