Re In The Matter Of Sarah Apeyo (Adoption Cause No. 146 of 2010)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court granted adoption order to American couple despite non-compliance with 36-month fostering requirement under Children Act s.46, finding that the child's welfare was paramount. The biological mother was HIV positive with no stable income and had consented to the adoption. The applicants had fostered the child for over 12 months, had no criminal record, and demonstrated commitment to the child's welfare.
Outcome
Adoption order granted; applicants permitted to travel out of Uganda with the child subject to annual reporting requirements
Facts
American couple Christopher John Mckim and Jennifer Janel Mckim were granted legal guardianship of Sarah Apeyo, a six-year-old child, in October 2009. They attempted to obtain a visa to travel with the child to the USA but were refused due to insufficient information. Investigation revealed that contrary to initial representations, the child's biological mother Anna Okere was alive. Anna Okere is HIV positive, lives in poverty, earns income from selling local beer, has four children none of whom have attended school, and lives in a mud and wattle house. The child's father, Lotiko Joseph, was deceased. After visa refusal, the child was placed in Oasis Children's Home under a care order. The applicants maintained contact and financial support for the child during their absence. Anna Okere consented to the adoption, understanding she would give up the child permanently, and confirmed she received no payment. The applicants sought an adoption order despite not meeting the statutory 36-month fostering requirement.
Issues
- Whether the applicants should be granted an adoption order despite not having been resident in Uganda or having fostered the child for the statutory 36-month period under sections 46(1)(a) and (b) of the Children Act.
- Whether the adoption order would be in the best interests and welfare of the child.
Orders
- The petitioners are appointed the adoptive parents of Sarah Apeyo.
- The petitioners are directed to register the order with the Registrar of Documents, Uganda Registration Services Bureau, Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Kampala.
- The petitioners are directed to register the order with the United States Embassy in Kampala, and the Ugandan Embassy in Washington.
- The petitioners are permitted to travel out of Uganda with the child.
- The petitioners are directed to file a report once every year regarding the state of welfare and development of the child with the Registrar, Family Division, High Court of Uganda, until the child is 18 years of age or until directed otherwise.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
Cases cited (1)
- In re M (SCCA No. 22 of 2004)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.