Real Gaba Market Property Owner v Kampala Capital City Authority (Civil Suit No. 248 of 2008)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a suit instituted by a nonexistent entity (Real Ggaba Market Property Owners Ltd, which was not incorporated) is a nullity ab initio and cannot be cured by amendment to substitute it with an incorporated company (Real Gaba Market Property Owners Ltd). A plaint filed by a nonentity discloses no cause of action and the purported substitution by amendment was itself a nullity. The plaint was struck out and dismissed with costs.
Outcome
Plaint struck out — suit dismissed with costs to defendant
Facts
The plaintiff, described as Real Ggaba Market Property Owners Ltd, filed Civil Suit No. 248 of 2008 against Kampala City Council. The plaintiff later sought to amend the plaint to substitute the defendant with Kampala Capital City Authority and to correct the plaintiff's name from Real Ggaba (double 'G') to Real Gaba (single 'G'). The court granted the amendment but the extracted order only reflected the substitution of the defendant, not the plaintiff's name. The defendant raised a preliminary objection on the ground that Real Ggaba Market Property Owners Ltd is a nonexistent entity because only Real Gaba Market Property Owners Ltd is an incorporated company with a certificate of incorporation. The certificate of incorporation, memorandum and articles of association, and certificate of title all bore the name Real Gaba (single 'G'). Members of Real Gaba disowned the suit filed in their name.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff had the legal capacity to institute this suit.
- Whether the instant suit was filed pursuant to a company resolution.
- Whether the amended plaint is properly before court.
- What are the remedies available to the parties?
Orders
- The plaint is struck out and dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Companies Act 2012 s.21
- Companies Act 2012 s.22
- Evidence Act s.114
- Advocates (Professional Conduct) Regulations S.I. 267-2 Reg.2
Cases cited (10)
- V.G. Keshwala v M.M. Sheik Dawood (HCMA No. 543 of 2011)
- Ssimbwa & Afidra Milton v Trustees of Rubaga Miracle Centre & Another (HCMA No. 576 of 2006)
- Bugerere Coffee Growers v Sebadduka & Another [1970] EA 147
- Nsimbe Holdings Ltd v Attorney General & Another (Constitutional Petition No. 2 of 2006)
- Makula International Ltd v His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga & Another [1982] HCB 11
- Verjee Brothers (U) Ltd v Tatu Naiga & Co (HCCS No. 587 of 1993)
- Herman P. Steyn v Charles Thys (KCA 1986 of 1996)
- Banque International De Commerce De Portorgrand v Gaukassaow (3) [1923] 2 KB 682
- Mulangira Ssimbwa v Board of Trustees Miracle Centre & Pastor Robert Kayanja (HCMA No. 655 of 2005)
- Auto Garage v Motokov [1971] EA 514
Cases citing this judgment (5)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Roko Construction Ltd v Ssempijja (H.C.Miscellaneous Application No. 38 of 2019)
- Roko Construction Ltd v Male (H.C.Miscellaneous Application No. 37 of 2021)
- Krone Uganda Limited v Kerilee Investments Limited (Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 306 of 2019)
- Ggaba Market Property Owners Limited v Kampala Capital City Authority (Civil Suit No. 153 of 2006)
- Real Ggaba Market Property Owners Ltd v Kampala Capital City Authority and 8 Others (Miscellaneous Appeal No. 006 of 2012)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.