Registered Trustees of Freemasons hall v Uganda Revenue Authority (Taxation Application No 20 of 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Tax Appeals Tribunal dismissed the application for tax exemption, holding that the applicant's trust deed did not establish it as a religious or charitable institution of public character. The Tribunal found that the applicant's objectives, as stated in its trust deed, were limited to acquiring and managing property, not religious or charitable purposes. The Tribunal further held that rental income from hiring the Freemasons Hall to lodges was taxable under s.5 of the Income Tax Act.
Outcome
Application for tax exemption dismissed; applicant's rental income held taxable
Facts
The applicant, Registered Trustees of Freemasons Hall, is a trust registered with the Ministry of Land. It owns and manages Freemasons Hall at Plot 18 Nakasero Road. The applicant applied to Uganda Revenue Authority for tax exemption on the basis that it is a religious entity. The respondent rejected the application on the ground that the applicant is not a religious institution of public character. The applicant objected, and the objection was dismissed. The applicant then filed an application before the Tax Appeals Tribunal. Evidence showed that the applicant receives rental income from lodges of freemasons who hire the hall. The applicant's witnesses testified that freemasons believe in a supreme being and conduct charitable activities such as donating wheelchairs to hospitals. The applicant's trust deed stated its objectives as acquiring and managing property, including letting or hiring out the Freemasons Hall.
Issues
- Whether the applicant is an exempt institution under s.2(bb) of the Income Tax Act?
- Whether the applicant's income from the hire of the hall is taxable?
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
Cases cited (6)
- Sinba (K) Ltd and 4 Others v UBC and Others (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 3 of 2014)
- R v Registrar General, Ex parte Sargal and another [1970] 3 ALL ER 886
- Church of New Faith v Commissioner of Pay - roll Tax (Victoria) [1983] HCA 40
- Ashbury Rly Carriage and Iron Company v Richie (1875) LR 7 HL 653
- Jehovah's Witness Case [1943] ALR 193
- Regina v Registrar General, Ex parte Sergerdal [1970] 3 ALL ER 866
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.