Wakilii

Rex v Ahmed (Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 1945)

East African Court of Appeal · [1945] EACA 56 · 1945 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Criminal appeal from conviction by Resident Magistrate, Nakuru
Decision
Conviction upheld; accused remains convicted of possession of native spirituous liquor

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Court held that under the Native Liquor (Amendment) Ordinance, 1941, the onus of proving absence of knowledge of possession of native spirituous liquor rests on the accused. This onus is not as heavy as the Crown's burden in ordinary criminal cases. The accused must establish that lack of knowledge was so probable that a prudent man ought to believe it. The Court found the accused failed to discharge this onus and dismissed the appeal.

Outcome

Conviction upheld; accused remains convicted of possession of native spirituous liquor

Facts

The appellant was convicted of possessing native spirituous liquor contrary to section 3(1) of the Native Liquor (Amendment) Ordinance, 1941. A tin of Nubian gin was found in his store. The prosecution witness Rashid testified he purchased a bottle of Nubian gin from the accused on 16 October 1944. The accused claimed Rashid left the tin with him for safekeeping, saying it contained kerosene. Inspector Abdulla Said found the tin on a shelf in the store with other articles. Currency notes totaling Sh. 6 were found in the accused's bedroom, consistent with the alleged earlier sale. The accused claimed Sh. 8 was on the table representing loan repayment from Rashid, but the inspector denied finding Sh. 8. The tin found was full, suggesting no bottle had been removed from it.

Issues

  1. Whether the accused discharged the onus of proving absence of knowledge that the tin in his possession contained native spirituous liquor.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Criminal Law & Procedure — Statutory Offences — Possession of Prohibited Substances — Burden of Proof
Under the Native Liquor (Amendment) Ordinance, 1941, the onus of proving absence of knowledge of possession of native spirituous liquor is placed on the accused.
Evidence — Burden of Proof — Standard of Proof — Statutory Reversal of Onus
Where statute places the onus on an accused to prove absence of knowledge, that onus is not as heavy as the Crown's burden in ordinary criminal cases and is sufficiently discharged if the evidence establishes that lack of knowledge was so probable that a prudent man ought under the circumstances to believe that fact.
Evidence — Accomplice Evidence — Weight and Credibility — Selective Acceptance
A trial court may properly accept an accomplice's denials of certain facts while treating his evidence on other matters as requiring corroboration, where the circumstances justify differential treatment of different parts of his testimony.

Legislation cited (3)

  • Native Liquor (Amendment) Ordinance, 1941 s.4(1)
  • Native Liquor (Amendment) Ordinance, 1941 s.3(1)
  • Indian Evidence Act s.3

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Rex v Ahmed (Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 1945) [1945] EACA 56 (1 January 1945)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.