Rex v Anyoro (Cr. App, No. 194 of 1938.)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal held that a confession made to a Chief is not ipso facto inadmissible under a strict reading of the Evidence Ordinance Cap. 68 s.24. The Court found sufficient corroboration of the children's evidence in the appellant's conduct in leading the Chief to where the murder weapon was hidden. The appeal against conviction for murder was dismissed.
Outcome
Conviction for murder upheld
Facts
The appellant was convicted of murdering a child. Two children of tender years testified that they had seen the appellant kill the deceased with a spear. The Wan Pach (Chief) of Alegi gave evidence that the accused had voluntarily confessed to him that he had killed the child and that the appellant had shown him where the spear was hidden. The appellant appealed the conviction.
Issues
- Whether a confession made to a Chief is admissible in evidence under the Evidence Ordinance (Laws of Uganda) Cap. 68 s.24.
- Whether there was sufficient corroboration of the evidence of children of tender years.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Evidence Ordinance (Laws of Uganda) Cap. 68 s.24
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.