Wakilii

Rex v Awadh (Criminal Appeal No. 239 of 1946)

East African Court of Appeal · [1946] EACA 52 · 1946 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Second appeal from High Court of Tanganyika against conviction and severity of sentence for official corruption
Decision
Conviction upheld; appeal dismissed

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Court held that no appeal lies to the Court of Appeal sitting in second appeal on matters of sentence severity, provided the sentence is competent. On the substantive issue, the Court held that bribing a police officer to influence a pending prosecution falls within section 91(2) of the Penal Code, regardless of whether that officer has final authority to withdraw the prosecution. The act of attempting to influence any police officer in connection with a pending prosecution by way of bribe constitutes the offence.

Outcome

Conviction upheld; appeal dismissed

Facts

Two members of the Arab Association quarrelled and fought in the street. One was charged with assault. The Association wished to avoid prosecution. The appellant, attempting to have the charge withdrawn, approached Assistant Superintendent Duffil at the police station. After unsuccessful attempts during the morning to have the case withdrawn, the appellant handed Duffil an envelope containing Sh. 100 with the words "This is for your help". The appellant was charged and convicted of bribing a police officer contrary to section 91(2) of the Penal Code. The High Court rejected his appeal summarily. He appealed further to the Court of Appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether an appeal lies to the Court of Appeal in a second appeal on grounds of severity of sentence.
  2. Whether the facts proved established an offence under section 91(2) of the Penal Code where the police officer approached was not the authority with final decision-making power over the prosecution.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Criminal Law & Procedure — Appeals — Second Appeal — Severity of Sentence
No appeal lies to the Court of Appeal sitting in second appeal on matters of severity of sentence, provided the sentence imposed is a competent sentence.
Criminal Law & Procedure — Official Corruption — Bribery of Police Officer — Scope of Offence
An offence under section 91(2) of the Penal Code is established where a person bribes a police officer to influence a pending prosecution, regardless of whether that particular officer has final authority to withdraw the prosecution. Any attempt by way of bribe to influence a police officer in connection with a pending prosecution falls within the section.
Criminal Law & Procedure — Official Corruption — Bribery — Implied Request to Influence
Where an accused hands money to a police officer with words such as "This is for your help" in the context of attempting to have a prosecution withdrawn, it may be inferred that the officer is being asked either to withdraw the prosecution or to influence someone else to do so.

Legislation cited (1)

  • Penal Code (Tanganyika Territory) s.91(2)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Rex v Awadh (Criminal Appeal No. 239 of 1946) [1946] EACA 52 (1 January 1946)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.