Rex v Beliram (Cr. App. 9-1930.)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
An order to prosecute a fraudulent debtor under the Bankruptcy Ordinance is not exhausted by ineffective proceedings instituted by a person without statutory authority. The order requires prosecution by the Attorney General under section 145. An ineffective charge by an unauthorised person does not comply with the court's order.
Outcome
Matter remitted to magistrate for hearing of the prosecution properly instituted by the Attorney General
Facts
On 30 August 1929, Thomas J. ordered that debtor Ramchand Beliram be prosecuted under the Bankruptcy Ordinance for failing to disclose ornaments worth Sh. 2,000 to the Trustee. On 3 September 1929, one Budh Singh filed an information. On 26 November 1929, the magistrate discharged the accused, holding that under section 145 proceedings must be instituted by the Attorney General. The Attorney General then instituted prosecution with proper authority. The respondent objected that the original order had been exhausted by the first discharge and no further charge could be made without a new order. The magistrate accepted this contention and discharged the accused. The Attorney General appealed.
Issues
- Whether an order to prosecute under the Bankruptcy Ordinance is exhausted by abortive proceedings that were not instituted in accordance with the statutory requirements.
- Whether the Attorney General may be represented by counsel in criminal appeals.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- The prosecution instituted by the Attorney General must be heard and determined.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1925 s.134(1)
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1925 s.141
- Bankruptcy Ordinance 1925 s.145
- Chapter 7 of the Laws of Kenya s.447
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.