Wakilii

Rex v Cherwan (Criminal Appeal No. 159 of 1951)

East African Court of Appeal · [1951] EACA 203 · 1951 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Criminal appeal from High Court of Uganda murder conviction
Decision
Conviction for murder upheld

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against a murder conviction. The defence of provocation failed because the attack occurred after the beating had ended and the deceased was lying in repose, indicating the act was prompted by revenge rather than sudden loss of self-control. The court commented that closer observance of Criminal Procedure Code provisions regarding formal charges and preliminary inquiries is required, and that proper chain of custody for exhibits must be maintained in murder cases.

Outcome

Conviction for murder upheld

Facts

The appellant was convicted of murdering her husband by striking him on the head with a heavy stone weighing approximately 10-15 pounds, causing a fissure fracture and brain compression. According to her evidence, her husband came home drunk from a beer party, accused her of interfering with his drinking tube, and beat her with his fists before lying down on his bed. After the beating ended and while he was lying in repose, she went outside, picked up the stone, returned to the house, and struck him with it. She had been beaten by him on several previous occasions. The High Court rejected her defence of provocation.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial judge erred in rejecting the defence of provocation where the appellant struck her husband with a stone after he had beaten her and was lying in repose.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Provocation — Defence — Time Lapse Between Provocation and Retaliation
Where an accused person retaliates against an assailant after the beating has ended and the assailant is lying in repose, the defence of provocation fails because the attack was not made under sudden provocation depriving the accused of self-control, but was prompted by a desire for revenge after time for passion to cool.
Criminal Procedure — Formal Charge — Arrest Without Warrant
When an accused person arrested without a warrant is brought before a Magistrate, section 85(6) of the Criminal Procedure Code requires a formal charge containing a statement of the offence to be signed and presented by the Police Officer preferring the charge, with particulars specified under sections 133 and 136. A Charge Sheet copied from the Police Charge Register, even if containing essential particulars, does not satisfy this requirement if it also contains a précis of evidence.
Preliminary Inquiry — Reading Over Charge
Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code requires a Magistrate conducting a preliminary inquiry to read over and explain to the accused person at the commencement of such inquiry the charge in respect of which the inquiry is being held.
Chain of Custody — Exhibits — Murder Weapon
In murder cases, care must be taken to prove a complete chain of custody for exhibits, particularly the weapon alleged to have been used in the offence.

Legislation cited (4)

  • Uganda Criminal Procedure Code s.85(6)
  • Uganda Criminal Procedure Code s.133
  • Uganda Criminal Procedure Code s.136
  • Uganda Criminal Procedure Code s.221

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Rex v Cherwan (Criminal Appeal No. 159 of 1951) [1951] EACA 203 (1 January 1951)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.