Rex v Cronk (Cr. R. 64-1931.)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that the words 'tax last payable' in section 13 of the Non-native Poll Tax Ordinance relate to tax for the current year, not the preceding year. The accused had been convicted for refusing to produce his 1930 tax receipt when the request was made in 1931. The Court quashed the conviction, reasoning that if 'tax last payable' referred to the preceding year's tax, there would be no power to call for the receipt for tax payable in the current year.
Outcome
Conviction quashed and fine ordered to be refunded
Facts
The accused was charged and convicted under section 13(2) and (3) of the Non-native Poll Tax Ordinance with refusing to furnish information required by a collector. He was sentenced to a fine of Sh. 20. The accused had been asked by a collector to produce his tax receipt for 1930 but declined on the ground that he had previously exhibited his 1930 receipt at the District Commissioner's Office. In a subsequent case, the Resident Magistrate held that 'tax last payable' refers to tax for the current year and asked the Supreme Court to revise the sentence in the earlier case if this interpretation was correct.
Issues
- Whether the phrase 'tax last payable' in section 13 of the Non-native Poll Tax Ordinance refers to tax for the current year or the preceding year.
Orders
- Conviction quashed.
- Fine to be refunded if paid.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Non-native Poll Tax Ordinance Cap. 52 s.13
- Non-native Poll Tax Ordinance Cap. 52 s.13(2)
- Non-native Poll Tax Ordinance Cap. 52 s.13(3)
Cases cited (1)
- Rex v Flood (Criminal Case No. 3407 of 1931)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.