Rex v Isingoma (Cr. App. No. 131 of 1939)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal upheld the murder conviction. Held that section 196(c) of the Uganda Penal Code codifies the English law rule that where death is caused during commission or attempted commission of a felony involving violence, the offence is murder. The circumstantial evidence—the deceased's naked body, torn clothing scattered in the bush, the appellant's torn kanzu, and his flight from the scene—raised an irresistible inference that the appellant attempted to rape or indecently assaulted the deceased. Death by strangulation occurring during such a felony constitutes murder even without proof of intent to kill.
Outcome
Appellant's conviction for murder upheld; appeal dismissed
Facts
The appellant followed the deceased and her brother who were carrying water pots. When the deceased stopped to tie up her pots, her brother continued ahead. The appellant was last seen alive with the deceased, helping her tie the pots. Shortly afterwards, the deceased's brother returned and saw the appellant running from bushes near where the deceased's body was later found. When the appellant arrived home, his kanzu was torn to shreds and he became annoyed when questioned by his wife. The deceased's body was found naked except for one piece of clothing on her waist or stomach, with other clothing scattered nearby. Water pots lay near the body. Medical evidence showed death was instantaneous due to strangulation and fracture of the thyroid cartilage. Medical evidence was inconclusive as to rape or attempted rape due to the body's condition after several days. The appellant denied the charges.
Issues
- Whether the circumstantial evidence established that the appellant caused the death of the deceased.
- Whether the facts established malice aforethought sufficient to support a conviction for murder under section 196(c) of the Uganda Penal Code.
- Whether the evidence supported an inference that the appellant was committing or attempting to commit a felony involving violence at the time of the death.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Conviction for murder upheld.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Uganda Penal Code s.196(c)
- Uganda Penal Code s.129
- Uganda Penal Code s.132
Cases cited (1)
- Rex v Beard (1920) 89 LJKB 437
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.