Rex v Kwesi (Criminal Appeal No. 140 of 1939)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The material date for determining whether a person is under sixteen years of age for purposes of the death sentence prohibition under section 25(2) of the Penal Code is the date on which sentence is passed, not the date of commission of the offence. Where an accused committed murder while under sixteen but was over sixteen at the time of conviction and sentence, the death sentence may lawfully be imposed.
Outcome
Conviction and death sentence upheld; court noted mitigating factors of youth at time of offence and provocation for consideration in clemency proceedings
Facts
The appellant committed murder on 6 July 1937 when he was under sixteen years of age. He absconded immediately after the offence and was only brought to trial in May 1939, by which time he was seventeen years of age. He was convicted and sentenced to death on 9 May 1939. Medical examination confirmed the appellant was eighteen years old at the time of appeal, meaning he was under sixteen at the time of the offence but seventeen at the time of sentence. The court noted that the appellant had received considerable provocation, though not amounting to provocation in law.
Issues
- Whether it was lawful to sentence the appellant to death when he was under sixteen years of age at the time of committing murder but over sixteen years of age at the time of conviction and sentence.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Penal Code (Kenya) s.25(2)
- Children Act 1908 s.131
Cases cited (1)
- R v Pitt (1919) 2 IR 35
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.