Wakilii

Rex v Kyeyune and Others (Criminal Appeals Nos. 134, 135, 136, 137 and 138 of 1941)

East African Court of Appeal · [1941] EACA 84 · 1941 Appeals Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Criminal appeals from convictions for murder in the High Court of Uganda
Decision
Appellants' convictions for murder upheld; capital sentences confirmed

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Five appellants convicted of murder after beating a person they believed to be a thief. The Court of Appeal held that where multiple persons act with common intention to inflict an unmerciful beating resulting in death, each participant is guilty of murder under section 22 of the Penal Code. The medical evidence showed the victim suffered the worst beating the doctor had ever seen. The court found that those who took part must be taken to have known that grievous harm was a probable consequence. Appeals dismissed.

Outcome

Appellants' convictions for murder upheld; capital sentences confirmed

Facts

The five appellants and others set upon the deceased, whom they believed to be a thief or person addicted to thieving. They beat him with sticks with the common intention of giving him an unmerciful beating. The victim died soon afterwards. Medical evidence showed the body bore testimony to a beating so severe that the examining doctor had never seen worse. The trial judge found that all five accused participated in the beating and were actuated by a common intent to cause grievous harm. The assessors agreed with the judge's finding. All five appellants were convicted of murder.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellants were guilty of murder where death resulted from a severe beating administered by multiple persons acting with common intention.
  2. Whether section 22 of the Penal Code applied to make each appellant responsible for the death where they shared a common intention to cause grievous harm.

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed.
  • Convictions for murder upheld.
  • Capital sentences confirmed (subject to consideration of commutation by executive authority).

Rules and key headnotes

Murder — Common Intention — Section 22 Penal Code — Multiple Assailants
Where two or more persons form a common intention to prosecute an unlawful purpose and in the prosecution of that purpose an offence is committed of such a nature that its commission was a probable consequence of the prosecution of such purpose, each of them is deemed to have committed the offence under section 22 of the Penal Code.
Murder — Malice Aforethought — Intent to Cause Grievous Harm — Beating Resulting in Death
Where multiple persons set upon a victim with the common intention of giving an unmerciful beating and beat him so severely that he dies, each person who took part in the beating must be taken to have had knowledge that grievous harm at least was a probable consequence and is therefore guilty of murder.
Murder — Common Intention — Identification of Participants — Joint Liability
Any person identified as having taken part in a beating administered by multiple persons acting with common intention must be regarded as linked by that common intention and responsible for the death resulting from the beating.

Legislation cited (1)

  • Uganda Penal Code s.22

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Rex v Kyeyune and Others (Criminal Appeals Nos. 134, 135, 136, 137 and 138 of 1941) [1941] EACA 84 (1 January 1941)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.