Rex v Murobie and Another (Confirmation Case No. 198 of 1942)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Supreme Court alone has jurisdiction to try robbery with violence under section 289 of the Penal Code where two or more persons are charged with robbery, or where any person is charged with robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon, or where actual violence is used in the robbery. A First Class Subordinate Court has jurisdiction only over simple robbery by a solitary unarmed individual. The convictions by the First Class Magistrate were set aside for lack of jurisdiction.
Outcome
Convictions set aside for lack of jurisdiction; accused committed for trial by Supreme Court
Facts
On 23 December 1941 at about 10 a.m. at Lessos in the Uasin Gishu District, two accused persons, Kimengeng arap Murobie and Kindiywa arap Chemwor, were alleged to have robbed Kithengi wa Katero of a sack, a shirt, a tin, and Sh. 809 in cash, and to have used personal violence against the victim at or immediately after the time of the robbery. The two accused were convicted by a First Class Subordinate Court of robbery with violence contrary to section 289 of the Penal Code. The case came before the Court on confirmation.
Issues
- Whether a First Class Subordinate Court has jurisdiction to try a case of robbery with violence where two or more persons are charged and actual violence is used.
Orders
- Convictions and sentences set aside.
- Committal of the two accused for trial by the Supreme Court ordered.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Penal Code s.289
- Penal Code s.290
- Criminal Procedure Code s.4
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.