Rex v Ndelete and Others (Criminal Revision Cases Nos. 86 and 87 of 1934.)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that Rule 67 of the Diseases of Animals Rules 1931 was ultra vires the rule-making authority because it imposed penalties exceeding those permitted under section 9 of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance. Penalties under the Rules must be limited to £100 or two months' imprisonment. Confiscation of stock cannot be ordered for contraventions of the Rules. The levy of a fine by private sale of chattels without the written consent of the offender is illegal under English law as incorporated by the Kenya Order-in-Council 1921.
Outcome
Confiscation order quashed; fines reduced in both cases; balance of fine levied in Case No. 87 to be returned
Facts
The two accused persons, squatters employed by a European farmer, pleaded guilty to charges of illegal movement of stock contrary to the Diseases of Animals Rules 1931. Ledama had imported 37 head of cattle and Niniere 34 head from the Bukwa Reserve in Uganda into Trans Nzoia Province without complying with the requirement that cattle be imported only through Kisumu and with the requisite veterinary certificates. The magistrate imposed fines of Sh. 600 in each case. In Case No. 86, the magistrate also ordered confiscation of the 37 cattle. In Case No. 87, a distress warrant was issued, 34 cattle were seized, and 17 were sold by private treaty five days later, with the remainder released to the defendant after a permit was obtained from the Chief Veterinary Officer. The European farmer who employed the accused had already been fined Sh. 600 for offences arising from the same transactions.
Issues
- Whether Rule 67 of the Diseases of Animals Rules 1931, which imposed a penalty of £150 or six months' imprisonment, was ultra vires the rule-making authority.
- Whether confiscation of stock could be ordered in respect of a contravention of the Rules.
- Whether the levy of a fine by private sale of the offender's chattels without written consent was lawful.
Orders
- Rule 67 declared ultra vires the rule-making authority.
- In Criminal Revision Case No. 86, the order for confiscation of 37 head of cattle quashed.
- In Criminal Revision Case No. 86, fine reduced from Sh. 600 to Sh. 300.
- In Criminal Revision Case No. 87, fine reduced from Sh. 600 to Sh. 300.
- In Criminal Revision Case No. 87, balance of fine already levied to be returned to the defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (10)
- Diseases of Animals Ordinance Cap. 157 s.7
- Diseases of Animals Ordinance Cap. 157 s.16
- Diseases of Animals Ordinance Cap. 157 s.21
- Diseases of Animals Rules 1931 r.15
- Diseases of Animals Rules 1931 r.67
- Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance Cap. 1 s.9
- Interpretation Ordinance s.2
- Criminal Procedure Code s.318(1)
- Summary Jurisdiction Act 1879 s.43
- Kenya Order-in-Council 1921 Art. IV
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.