Wakilii

Rex v Rwakaikara (Cr. App. 39-1931.)

East African Court of Appeal · [1931] EACA 15 · 1931 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Criminal appeal from conviction by High Court of Uganda
Decision
Conviction for indecent assault upheld

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against conviction for indecent assault. The Court held that evidence of a complaint made six days after the alleged offence was inadmissible, and that even if admissible, a complaint should be proved by stating what the prosecutrix said orally, not by producing a document recording the complaint. Despite this evidentiary error, the conviction was upheld as the remaining evidence supported the trial judge's findings.

Outcome

Conviction for indecent assault upheld

Facts

The appellant was charged with attempted rape and convicted of indecent assault under section 110 of the Penal Code by the High Court of Uganda in Criminal Case No. 6 of 1931. The Superintendent of the Criminal Investigation Department gave evidence that he arrived at Fort Portal on 31 October 1930 and took a statement from the prosecutrix on the same day. He filed her formal complaint on 1 November 1930 and produced both the complaint and her statement as exhibits. The appellant denied guilt and appealed his conviction.

Issues

  1. Whether evidence of a complaint made six days after the alleged offence was admissible.
  2. Whether the complaint should have been proved by oral testimony rather than by production of a written document.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Evidence — Complaint Evidence — Admissibility — Timing
A complaint made six days after the alleged offence is inadmissible as evidence of recent complaint.
Evidence — Complaint Evidence — Proof — Method
A complaint by a prosecutrix should be proved by oral testimony stating what she said, not by the production of a document in which the complaint was allegedly recorded.
Criminal Law & Procedure — Appeal — Conviction Despite Inadmissible Evidence
A conviction may be upheld on appeal where inadmissible evidence was admitted at trial but the remaining admissible evidence sufficiently supports the finding of fact and conviction.

Legislation cited (1)

  • Penal Code s.110

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Rex v Rwakaikara (Cr. App. 39-1931.) [1931] EACA 15 (1 January 1931)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.