Rex v Shipure (Confirmation Case No. 105 of 1942)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that where the complainant in a defilement case is a child of tender years whose evidence was neither sworn nor affirmed, corroboration of her evidence implicating the accused is necessary before a conviction can be sustained. In the absence of such corroboration, the conviction and sentence must be quashed.
Outcome
Accused released following quashing of conviction
Facts
The accused was convicted by the Resident Magistrate, Nairobi, of attempting to have unlawful carnal knowledge of Ester d/o Muhuana, a child stated by medical evidence to be nearly eight years old. The complainant was a baptized Christian child of tender years. The Magistrate did not swear or affirm the complainant before taking her evidence, presumably because of her age. The complainant gave evidence implicating the accused in the attempted defilement.
Issues
- Whether a conviction for attempted defilement can stand where the complainant, a child of tender years, gave unsworn and unaffirmed evidence without corroboration implicating the accused.
Orders
- Conviction quashed.
- Sentence quashed.
- Accused directed to be released.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (4)
- Rex v Solu wa Tutu (1934) 1 EACA 183
- Rex v Ramazani bin Mawingu (1936) 3 EACA 39
- Rex v Cherop A Kinei and Another (1936) 3 EACA 124
- Rex v Opet s/o End (1936) 3 EACA 122
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.