Rex v Singh (Criminal Appeal No. 89 of 1947)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where an appellant withdrew his appeal against conviction in the Supreme Court and confined his appeal to sentence only, and the Supreme Court accordingly limited its order to the sentence appeal, any further appeal to the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa against both conviction and sentence is barred by section 360 of the Kenya Criminal Procedure Code. The right of appeal is limited to matters actually determined by the lower appellate court.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as barred by statute
Facts
The appellant was convicted and sentenced in the Resident Magistrate's Court. He appealed to the Supreme Court of Kenya against both conviction and sentence. During the Supreme Court proceedings, the appellant withdrew his appeal against conviction and proceeded only on the appeal against sentence. The Supreme Court reduced his sentence. The appellant then attempted to appeal to the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa against both conviction and sentence.
Issues
- Whether an appeal to the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa lies against both conviction and sentence where the appellant withdrew the appeal against conviction in the lower appellate court and that court confined its order to sentence only.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed as misconceived and not entertained by the Court.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Kenya Criminal Procedure Code s.360
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.