Rex v Titi (Criminal Appeal No. 153 of 1947)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal held that when admitting a deposition to be read in evidence under section 275 of the Tanganyika Criminal Procedure Code or corresponding provisions in other territories, the judge must state the grounds on which the order is made. It is insufficient to merely record 'Admitted under the provisions of section 275' without stating reasons.
Outcome
Procedural Guidance
Issues
- Whether a judge admitting a deposition under section 275 of the Criminal Procedure Code must state the grounds for the order.
Orders
- Court made observations on procedural requirements for admission of depositions under section 275.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Tanganyika Criminal Procedure Code s.275
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.