Robin v Rex (Cr.. App. 3-1929.)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal quashed a murder conviction, holding that the deceased's post-stabbing statement was inadmissible as neither res gestae nor dying declaration. The court further held that evidence of a wife by native custom against her husband is admissible, as the English rule of spousal privilege does not apply to native polygamous marriages. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused intended to kill when he struck the deceased during a drunken altercation.
Outcome
Accused acquitted
Facts
During a drinking party where most attendees were intoxicated, the accused Robin became truculent and quarrelled with a man called Damasco. Others disowned him and took him to his hut multiple times, but he kept returning. On the third occasion, Willem seized Robin from behind and they struggled. The deceased Timothe went to help and received a stab under the collar bone which resulted in his death. After being stabbed, the deceased made a remark variously reported, most credibly as "Look what Robin has done." The prosecution suggested the accused stabbed Timothe in mistake for Damasco. The accused was convicted of murder at trial in the High Court of Nyasaland.
Issues
- Whether the deceased's statement after being stabbed was admissible as part of the res gestae or as a dying declaration.
- Whether evidence by the accused's wife by native custom was admissible against him.
- Whether the accused intended to kill the deceased or any other person when he struck the fatal blow.
Orders
- Conviction quashed.
- Accused acquitted.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Indian Evidence Act 1872 s.122
Cases cited (3)
- R v Beddingjield (14 Cox 341)
- R v Goddard (15 Cox 7)
- U v Amkeyo (7 EALR 14)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.