Rwakaikara Kiiza v Attorney General (Civil Suit No. 1322 of 2000)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the plaintiff failed to prove special damages for salary arrears with sufficient particularity, as required for special damages claims. General damages of Shs.4,000,000/= awarded for breach of contract arising from non-payment of salary during remand and delayed reinstatement after acquittal. Interest at 20% per annum from judgment date awarded.
Outcome
Plaintiff awarded general damages and costs but claim for special damages dismissed
Facts
The plaintiff, a teacher from 1960 to 1999, was arrested in July 1985 and charged with kidnapping with intent to murder under Penal Code s.235(a). He remained on remand until July 1990 when the High Court at Fort Portal acquitted him. During his five-year remand period, his salary was not paid. After acquittal and release, reinstatement was delayed and only partial salary arrears were eventually paid despite multiple pleas to the Ministry of Education. The plaintiff sued the Attorney General seeking recovery of salary arrears as special damages totalling Shs.1,773,865/=, general damages for breach of contract, interest at 50% per annum from 1985, and costs. The defendant did not appear and the matter proceeded ex parte.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover special damages for salary arrears not paid during his period on remand.
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for breach of contract arising from non-payment of salary.
Orders
- Special damages claim dismissed.
- General damages of Shs.4,000,000/= awarded to the plaintiff.
- Interest at 20% per annum on general damages from date of judgment until final payment.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Penal Code s.235(a)
Cases cited (1)
- Estate of Shami Visram and Kurji Karsan v Shankerprasad Maganlal Bhatt & Others [1965] EA 789
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.