Wakilii

Saburi v Mzee (Civil Appeal No. 17 of 1941)

East African Court of Appeal · [1942] EACA 44 · 1942 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Civil appeal from Mudir's Court judgment in favour of plaintiff
Decision
Appeal dismissed; judgment for respondent upheld; money to be held in trust for minor until she comes of age

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

A Mohammedan mother may sue to recover property owed to her minor child under both the Shafi and Hanafi Schools of Mohammedan Law. Under Shafi law, whilst the mother is not guardian of the child's property, she may sue to recover it though she cannot use or dispose of it without court order. Under Hanafi law, the mother is full guardian in the absence of the father and grandfather. Money recovered should be invested in the Post Office Savings Bank in the name of an administrative officer until the minor comes of age.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed; judgment for respondent upheld; money to be held in trust for minor until she comes of age

Facts

The respondent, a Mohammedan mother, brought suit on behalf of her infant daughter whose father was deceased to recover Sh. 100 from the appellant upon a written acknowledgment of debt signed by the appellant. The appellant gave unequivocal written acknowledgment that he owed the sum to the minor daughter but provided no evidence or explanation in the lower court. The Mudir's Court found in favour of the plaintiff. The appellant appealed primarily on the ground that the mother had no authority under Mohammedan Law to institute suit on behalf of her infant daughter. Neither party appeared at the appeal hearing.

Issues

  1. Whether a Mohammedan mother has authority under Mohammedan Law to institute a suit on behalf of her infant daughter to recover a debt owed to the infant.
  2. Whether the mother's capacity to sue differs under the Shafi and Hanafi Schools of Mohammedan Law.
  3. What orders should be made regarding custody of money recovered on behalf of a minor.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Judgment of the Court below upheld.
  • If the sum of Sh. 100 or any part thereof is recovered from the appellant, it should be invested on behalf of the minor in the Post Office Savings Bank in the name of the District Commissioner of the district in which the minor resides, until she becomes of age.

Rules and key headnotes

Mohammedan Law — Shafi School — Mother's capacity to sue on behalf of minor child
Under the Shafi School of Mohammedan Law, whilst the mother is not the guardian of the property of her minor child, she may nevertheless sue to recover the property of her child, although she is not allowed to use or dispose of it without an order of the Court.
Mohammedan Law — Hanafi School — Mother as guardian in absence of father and grandfather
Under the Hanafi School of Mohammedan Law, the mother is the full guardian in the absence of the father and grandfather, and may sue on behalf of her infant child to recover the infant's property.
Mohammedan Law — Protection of minor's property — Custody of recovered funds
Where money is recovered on behalf of a minor in proceedings brought by the mother, it is desirable in cases where the parties are poor that the money be invested on behalf of the minor in the Post Office Savings Bank in the name of an administrative officer until the infant comes of age.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Saburi v Mzee (Civil Appeal No. 17 of 1941) [1942] EACA 44 (1 January 1942)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.