Saggaf v Said (Civil Apeal No. 10 of 1942)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that under Mohammedan Law, dissolution of marriage cannot be granted on the ground of failure to provide maintenance in the past. The wife must prove the husband's inability to provide maintenance in the future. The Court further held that it is a negation of justice to make an order nisi absolute without giving the party an opportunity to show cause. Evidence must be given in civil causes; unsworn statements are insufficient. Where the plaintiff seeks only dissolution of marriage, the court cannot order payment of past maintenance. Appeal allowed.
Outcome
Decree of dissolution of marriage set aside
Facts
The respondent sued in the Kathi's Court at Lamu for dissolution of marriage under Mohammedan Law, claiming her husband had not maintained or clothed her for one year and ten months. No evidence was taken; each party made unsworn statements. The Kathi made an order nisi requiring the appellant to provide maintenance and clothing within three days, failing which the marriage would be dissolved. The order was made absolute without giving the appellant an opportunity to show compliance. The Kathi also ordered payment of maintenance despite the plaint seeking only dissolution. The appellant appealed.
Issues
- Whether a decree of dissolution of marriage can be granted under Mohammedan Law on the ground of failure to provide maintenance in the past.
- Whether an order nisi can be made absolute without giving the defendant an opportunity to show cause.
- Whether a court can order payment of past maintenance when the plaintiff seeks only dissolution of marriage.
- Whether evidence must be given in a civil cause to prove or disprove a case.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (1)
- Bimoto binti Ali v Dr Chur Khan (1929) 12 LRK 104
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.