Samuel Sserwanga v Annet Muhindi Kigonya (Civil Application No. 607 of 2026)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
On an uncontested application, the Court of Appeal held that an appeal does not abate on the death of a party (Rule 97, Judicature (Court of Appeal) Rules) and that, under section 218 of the Succession Act, a limited grant of administration may be made to a nominee of a party where the person entitled to administration is unable or unwilling to act, so as to enable a deceased party to be represented in a pending suit. Satisfied that Civil Appeal No. 102 of 2014 was long pending, that the deceased 1st Appellant had no administrator, and that the Respondent (his widow) was the proper person, the Court appointed her administrator ad litem limited to prosecuting that appeal.
Outcome
Application allowed; the Respondent appointed administrator ad litem of the late Tom Kaaya's estate limited to prosecuting Civil Appeal No. 102 of 2014
Facts
Tom Kaaya and Stanley Ndyabahika filed Civil Appeal No. 102 of 2014 challenging a High Court decision in which Namatovu Margaret was the successful party. After interparty scheduling, the 1st Appellant, Tom Kaaya, died, as did Namatovu Margaret, the Respondent in the appeal. Samuel Sserwanga, administrator of Namatovu Margaret's estate, had earlier been substituted for the deceased Respondent. The estate of Tom Kaaya had no administrator owing to disagreement in the family; his widow, Annet Muhindi Kigonya, had attempted to obtain a grant but met resistance from family members. Counsel formerly acting for the deceased 1st Appellant withdrew for lack of instructions after the widow failed to cooperate. The Court directed a formal substitution application. The Applicant brought this application to have the widow appointed administrator ad litem so that the long-pending appeal could be completed. The Respondent was served personally and via phone, but did not attend; the Court proceeded ex parte.
Issues
- Whether the Court should appoint the Respondent as administrator ad litem of the estate of the deceased 1st Appellant, limited to prosecuting the pending appeal, under section 218 of the Succession Act.
- Whether a pending appeal abates on the death of an appellant and whether the Court may substitute the legal representative of the deceased.
Orders
- The application is allowed.
- Annet Muhindi Kigonya is appointed Administrator ad litem in respect of the estate of the late Tom Kaaya, limited to prosecuting Civil Appeal No. 102 of 2014 before this Court.
- The Respondent Administrator ad litem be served with this Ruling and an extract order.
- The Applicant shall meet his own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Succession Act, Cap 268 (also rendered Cap 296 in the judgment) s.218
- Judicature (Court of Appeal) Rules SI 13-10 r.2
- Judicature (Court of Appeal) Rules SI 13-10 r.43
- Judicature (Court of Appeal) Rules SI 13-10 r.97
- Judicature Act s.11
Cases cited (2)
- Henry Mukasa Mawangala and 2 Others v George William Bule (Civil Application No. 1008 of 2012)
- Winrose Emmah Ndinda Kiamba v Agnes Nthambi [2021] eKLR
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.