Sande Deus v Attorney General [2019] UGHRC 56
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Tribunal held that the complainant's right to freedom from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment was not violated. The injuries sustained during re-arrest resulted from the complainant's resistance to lawful arrest after escaping police custody. Under the Criminal Procedure Code s.2(2), police may use necessary means to effect arrest when a person forcibly resists. Medical evidence showed no obvious signs of physical injuries beyond soft tissue damage consistent with struggle during re-arrest.
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Facts
On 16 January 2012 at approximately 10:00 pm, the complainant was at Mama Sarah's bar in Kyemamba trading centre when he was approached by the Officer in Charge of Kyemamba Police Post, another police officer, and his father-in-law Kizito. The complainant was arrested along with George Sylvester Niwagaba and taken toward Kyemamba Police Post. As they approached the post, the complainant escaped. He was subsequently re-arrested near his home. The complainant alleged he was beaten with sticks during the re-arrest, causing injuries to his hands and thighs. He was detained briefly at Kyemamba Police Post and released on police bond the following day. On 17 January 2012, Dr Ssenoga Siraj of Byansi Clinic examined the complainant and found a painful swollen wound on the right hand and chest pain with no obvious physical injuries. X-rays revealed no fractures. The doctor classified the injuries as soft tissue injuries constituting bodily harm.
Issues
- Whether the Complainant's right to freedom from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment was violated?
- Whether the Respondent is liable?
- Whether the Complainant is entitled to any remedy?
Orders
- The complaint is disallowed.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 24
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 44(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code Act Cap 116 s.2(2)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 7
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5
Cases cited (3)
- Salvatory Abuki and Another (SCCA No. 1 of 1998)
- Hon. Okupa Ellijah and 2020 Others v Attorney General and 3 Others (HCMC No. 14 of 2005)
- Chahal v United Kingdom (ECHR Application No. 22414/93)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.