Sande Pande Ndimwibo v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application No. 241 of 2014)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The single Justice dismissed the application for bail pending appeal. The Court held that an applicant for bail pending appeal no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence and must, in addition to the ordinary bail conditions, establish exceptional circumstances. Mere lodgement of a notice of appeal, the alleged high chances of success, a short sentence with risk of the appeal becoming nugatory, good character, first-offender status, and family hardship (including the wife's hypertension) did not amount to exceptional circumstances, particularly where the applicant had not taken steps to prosecute the appeal expeditiously. The application was found to be without merit and dismissed.
Outcome
Application for bail pending appeal dismissed; applicant remains in custody
Facts
The applicant, aged 43 and a convicted prisoner at Luzira Murchison Bay Prison, was convicted by the High Court at Kampala of obtaining money by false pretence, procuring another to commit an offence, and being a company director privy to falsification of company documents, contrary to sections 305, 19(2) and 323(6)(i) of the Penal Code Act. He was sentenced to two and a half years' imprisonment on all counts, to run concurrently, and ordered to refund shs. 970,624,348 to Uganda Revenue Authority. The conviction arose from a fraudulent scheme in which the applicant and another successfully claimed a non-existent VAT refund of that sum. He lodged Criminal Appeal No. 799 of 2014 challenging his conviction and sentence, and applied for bail pending appeal, producing three sureties, surrendering his passport and a land title, and relying on high chances of success, a short sentence, family obligations, his wife's hypertension, and his prior compliance with bail conditions.
Issues
- Whether the applicant, a convicted and sentenced prisoner, established exceptional circumstances entitling him to release on bail pending appeal.
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 23
- Constitution of Uganda Article 28(3)(a)
- Trial on Indictments Act (Cap. 23) s.132(4)
- Criminal Procedure Code Act (Cap. 116) s.40(2)
- Rules of the Court of Appeal Rule 6(2)(a)
- Rules of the Court of Appeal Rule 43(1)
- Penal Code Act s.305
- Penal Code Act s.19(2)
- Penal Code Act s.323(6)(i)
Cases cited (5)
- Mugisha Gregory v Uganda (Criminal Reference No. 179 of 2011)
- Igamu Joanita v Uganda (Criminal Application No. 154 of 2013)
- High Court at Mbale: CR-CM-0071, 0072, 0073/2013 NAMUREMWE PATRICK, CHEBET ALFRED and YORAMU KASUMU vs UGANDA, unreported
- SINGH LAMBA VS R [1985] EA 337
- Angol Michael v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application No. 76 of 2014)
Cases citing this judgment (7)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Jemba Steven v Uganda (Misc.Criminal Application No. 78 of 2019)
- Walakira Lawrence v Uganda (Criminal Application No. 106 of 2019)
- Walakira v Uganda (Misc.Criminal Application No. 106 of 2019)
- Kamuhanda Moses Kule v Uganda (Criminal Application No. 154 of 2019)
- Niwamanya James v Uganda (Criminal Application No. 87 of 2019)
- Sheikh Muhamad Yunusu Kamoga v Uganda (Criminal Application No. 77 of 2017)
- Sheikh Yunus Kamoga v Uganda (Criminal Application No.77 of 2017)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.