Wakilii
HomeCase law › Saroj Gandesha v Transroad [2010] UGSC 27

Saroj Gandesha v Transroad [2010] UGSC 27

Citation: [2010] UGSC 27 Court: Supreme Court Decided: 28 October 2010 Jurisdiction: Uganda
Cited — treatment unverified cited in 2 (treatment unverified) Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Legal issues

Civil ProcedureStatutory InterpretationSuccession & EstatesContract LawEvidence

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

An administrator of a deceased advocate's estate cannot be compelled under Advocates Act s.56 to account for client funds paid out under a binding consent variation order.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how Saroj Gandesha applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.