School Outfitters (U) Ltd v Jennifer Bahange and Others (Civil Suit 750 of 1997)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Managing Director and Chairman had ostensible authority to sell company property where the Articles of Association vested management of company business in the Managing Director without restrictions, the company held her out as having such authority through her conduct over time, and third parties were entitled to rely on this representation without inquiring into internal restrictions.
Outcome
Sale agreement upheld as valid. Prayer for declaration of nullity denied. Prayer for return of machines denied. Matter remitted for valuation to determine whether any balance is payable by defendants.
Facts
The plaintiff company, through three directors including Mrs. Monica Erapu (Managing Director and Chairman), owned industrial sewing machines valued at Shs. 20 million. On 11 July 1997, Mrs. Erapu signed a sale agreement with the defendants for the machines for Shs. 6.9 million without board resolution or quorum. The defendants paid Shs. 5.3 million in cash and later tendered a cheque for the balance of Shs. 1.6 million, which was rejected. The defendants subsequently transferred the machines to Uniform Manufacturers and Distributors (U) Ltd. The third defendant, Paul Bagamizi, had worked for the plaintiff company as Marketing Manager for four years and testified that Mrs. Erapu regularly sold company property including cupboards. Article 75 of the company's Articles of Association vested management of the business in the Managing Director. Article 86 provided that the Chairman signs contracts with the Secretary or other officer. No board resolution restricting the Managing Director's powers was produced.
Issues
- Whether the Managing Director of the plaintiff company had no authority to sell, thereby rendering the agreement invalid.
- Whether the defendants had notice of the Managing Director's lack of authority to sell.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- The Registrar to appoint a valuer within 7 days.
- The valuer to value the machines in Exhibit P1 and report to the Registrar within 7 days after appointment.
- If the actual value of the machines is higher than Shs. 6,900,000, then the defendants shall pay the actual value less Shs. 5,300,000 already paid, within 30 days from the date of the report.
- Interest on the sum above will accrue after 30 days from the date of the report, at court rate, until payment in full.
- The parties to share the cost of valuation on a 50/50 basis.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Companies Act Cap. 85 Regulation 80
- Sale of Goods Act s.23
Cases cited (2)
- Emco Plastica Int. Ltd v Freeborn [1991] EA 432
- Vallbhds Hirji Kapadia v Thakersey Laximidas [1964] EA 378
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.