Selemani v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 042-2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights granted the Applicant leave to amend his pleadings pursuant to Rule 47 of the Rules of Court. The Court held that the request complied with Rules 47(1) and 47(2) as it was filed before the close of pleadings and specified the part of the pleadings to be amended.
Outcome
Leave to amend pleadings granted; amended pleadings to be served on Respondent State
Facts
The Applicant, a Tanzanian national incarcerated at Lilungu prison following conviction and sentence to death for murder by the High Court at Mtwara, filed an application before the African Court alleging violations of his rights under the African Charter. After the Court granted him legal aid, his Counsel sought leave to amend the pleadings to provide facts and evidence in support of his claims. The Respondent State opposed the request, characterising it as an afterthought with no basis. The request was filed before the close of pleadings.
Issues
- Whether the Applicant should be granted leave to amend his pleadings after the Court granted him legal aid.
Orders
- Request by the Applicant for leave to amend the pleadings granted.
- The Applicant's amended pleadings be deemed as duly filed and be served on the Respondent State.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (1)
- Andrew Ambrose Cheusi v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 004/2015)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.