Selimu Kaladini v Uganda [1993] UGHC 166
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a notice of appeal is filed when presented to the criminal registry with payment of necessary fees, not when administratively acknowledged by the District Registrar. Where the notice was received on 15 October 1992 and fees paid on 14 October 1992, only 6-7 days after sentence was passed on 7 October 1992, the filing was within the statutory 14-day period. The District Registrar's certificate showing receipt on 10 March 1993 reflected the date of administrative acknowledgment, not the filing date. Preliminary objection rejected.
Outcome
Appellant permitted to proceed with appeal on the merits
Facts
The appellant was sentenced on 7 October 1992 in Criminal Case No. MJ.922/92 before the Chief Magistrate's Court in Jinja. The appellant filed a notice of appeal which was received at the District Registry on 15 October 1992, with fees paid on 14 October 1992. The District Registrar's certificate erroneously indicated the notice was received on 10 March 1993. The respondent's counsel raised a preliminary objection that the notice of appeal was filed out of time, arguing that more than 14 days had elapsed between sentencing and filing if the March 1993 date was correct.
Issues
- Whether the notice of appeal was filed out of time.
Orders
- Preliminary objection rejected.
- Notice of appeal filed in time.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.