Sempijja v Roko Construction Ltd (Civil Suit No. 1100 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court Commercial Division entered judgment for the plaintiff in a debt recovery suit for UGX 581,128,142 arising from unpaid transport services. The defendant's application for leave to defend was dismissed for failure to disclose triable issues. The court found the evidence clearly established the debt, which remained unchallenged, and awarded the full claimed amount plus costs.
Outcome
Judgment entered for plaintiff for the full claimed amount with costs
Facts
Between January 2013 and August 2020, the plaintiff provided transport services to the defendant, hauling aggregate stones from the defendant's quarry in Bukerere to its batch plant at Nasser Road, Kampala. The plaintiff issued invoices totalling UGX 3,817,765,404. The defendant made payments by cash and cheque between May 2013 and August 2020 totalling UGX 3,236,637,262, leaving an outstanding balance of UGX 581,128,142. Despite several demands, the defendant refused to pay the balance. The defendant filed an application for leave to appear and defend, which was dismissed on 3 September 2021 for failure to disclose triable issues.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff established a debt owed by the defendant for transport services rendered.
- Whether the defendant disclosed triable issues warranting leave to defend.
Orders
- Judgment entered against the defendant.
- Defendant to pay plaintiff UGX 581,128,142.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.