Wakilii

Sewalu Charles and 2 Others v Nabakooza Winfred [2026] UGCOMMC 249

High Court · 2026 Revision Allowed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Civil revision application from a Chief Magistrate's Court judgment in a small claims matter
Decision
Lower court ruling set aside; consent agreement nullified; monies paid under consent to be refunded to applicant

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court held that a duly registered cooperative society has legal capacity to sue or be sued in its own name under the Cooperative Societies Act. It was therefore illegal, irregular and unjust for the Magistrate's Court to hold the chairperson of the cooperative society personally liable for refunding savings made to the registered entity. The revision succeeded and all orders against the individual applicant were set aside.

Outcome

Lower court ruling set aside; consent agreement nullified; monies paid under consent to be refunded to applicant

Facts

The respondent was a member of Masajja Small Scale Traders Co-operative Society Limited and made savings through the first applicant, Sewalu Charles, who was the chairperson of the cooperative. Payments were made to his personal mobile number but the respondent signed the cooperative's receipt books acknowledging the payments to the entity. When the respondent sought recovery of her savings, she sued Sewalu Charles personally in the Chief Magistrate's Court without joining the cooperative society as a party. The Magistrate made orders against Sewalu Charles personally to pay UGX 3,372,000. A consent agreement was subsequently signed and Sewalu Charles made payments to the respondent. He then brought this revision application challenging the lower court's decision to hold him personally liable for obligations of the registered cooperative society.

Issues

  1. Whether the matter is a proper case for revision of the Ruling and Orders in Small Claim No. 132 of 2024.
  2. Whether a duly registered cooperative society limited has the capacity to sue or be sued in its own name.
  3. Whether it was illegal, irregular and unjust for the lower court to hold the chairperson of a registered cooperative society personally liable for obligations of the society.

Orders

  • Revision application allowed.
  • The Ruling and Orders in Small Claim No. 132 of 2024 are hereby set aside.
  • The consent agreement between Mr. Sewalu Charles and the respondent is hereby set aside having been a product of and occasioned by errors, irregularity and illegality.
  • Monies paid to the respondent by Mr. Sewalu Charles occasioned by the aforementioned consent be paid back to him.
  • Costs of this application are awarded to Mr. Sewalu Charles.

Rules and key headnotes

Company Law — Cooperative Societies — Legal Personality — Capacity to Sue and Be Sued
A cooperative society registered under the Cooperative Societies Act becomes a body corporate with perpetual succession and has legal capacity to sue or be sued in its own name.
Civil Procedure — Revision — Grounds for Revision — Illegality and Irregularity
Under section 83 of the Civil Procedure Act, the High Court may revise a magistrate's decision where the lower court acted illegally, with material irregularity or injustice, including where it held an officer of a registered entity personally liable for the entity's obligations.
Company Law — Cooperative Societies — Personal Liability of Officers — Separate Legal Personality
It is illegal, irregular and unjust to hold the chairperson of a duly registered cooperative society personally liable for refunding monies owed by the society where the obligations were incurred by and on behalf of the registered entity.

Legislation cited (2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Oyam District Local Government v Aluku Grace (Revision Application No. 43 of 2021)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Sewalu Charles and 2 Others v Nabakooza Winfred 2026 UGCommC 249 (13 March 2026)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.