Shamilah Nakalule v Standard Chartered Bank (Miscellaneous Application No. 1930 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the applicant has locus standi as the registered proprietor of the mortgaged property. The application is not barred by res judicata because the previous civil suit abated, causing all related orders to lapse. The application is not moot as no evidence proves the property has been sold. Payment of 30% security deposit under Regulation 13(1) of the Mortgage Regulations is not required before filing but is a mandatory condition upon grant of the injunction. The applicant satisfied the grounds for a temporary injunction. Temporary injunction granted conditional upon payment of 30% of the outstanding amount within 60 days, failing which the order lapses automatically.
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted conditional upon payment of 30% security deposit within 60 days
Facts
The applicant obtained a loan facility from the respondent bank in 2014 for UGX 700,000,000 secured by land at Kyadondo Block 218 Plot 1028 at Najjera. The applicant claims she fully repaid the loan in 2017. In August 2025, the respondent advertised the applicant's property for sale, asserting the applicant was indebted to the tune of UGX 672,124,957. The applicant filed Civil Suit No. 1034 of 2025 challenging the debt and the proposed sale. The respondent contends the applicant defaulted and entered into a repayment agreement in 2018 with a third party who failed to settle the outstanding sums. The respondent exercised its rights as mortgagee and accepted a bid from the highest bidder. The applicant filed this application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the sale pending determination of the main suit.
Issues
- Whether the Applicant lacks locus standi to bring the application.
- Whether the application is barred by res judicata.
- Whether the application has been rendered moot by subsequent events.
- Whether the application infringes upon the rights of a non-joined third party.
- Whether the Applicant was required to pay 30% of the outstanding amount before filing the application.
- Whether the Applicant has satisfied the grounds warranting the grant of a temporary injunction.
Orders
- A temporary injunction is issued restraining the respondent, her agents, associates, assignees, affiliates, licensees, or legal representatives from attaching and selling off the applicant's property comprised in Kyadondo Block 218 Plot 1028 land at Najjera until hearing and determination of High Court Civil Suit No. 1034 of 2025 subject to the applicant depositing, in court, 30% of the outstanding amount within a period of 60 days of this order failing which the order shall lapse automatically.
- The costs of this application are to abide the result of the main suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (10)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.98
- Judicature Act Cap 16 s.37
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order 41 rules 1, 2, 3 & 9
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order 15 rule 3
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order XIA rule 1(6)
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order XIA rule 1(7)
- Mortgage Act 2009
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 Regulation 13
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 Regulation 13(1)
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 Regulation 13(6)
Cases cited (13)
- Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd [1969] EA 696
- Njau and others v City Council of Nairobi [1976-1985] 1 EA 397
- Equity Bank (U) Ltd and Another v Great Value Safaris Ltd and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 007 of 2024)
- Fellowes and Son v Fisher [1976] 1 QB 122
- American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Limited [1975] AC 396
- Geilla v Cassman Brown Co. Ltd [1973] EA 358
- GAPCO Uganda Limited v Kaweesa and another (Miscellaneous Application No. 259 of 2013)
- Willis International Engineering and Contractors Ltd and another v DFCU Bank (Miscellaneous Application No. 1000 of 2015)
- Miao Huaxian v Crane Bank Limited and another (Miscellaneous Application No. 935 of 2015)
- G.S Royal Hardware and Industries Ltd and another v Equity Bank (U) Ltd and another (Miscellaneous Application No. 721 of 2015)
- Parul Ben Barot v Victoria Finance Company Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 319 of 2017)
- Alpha2 Business Company Ltd v Diamond Trust Bank Ltd and two others (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 71 of 2016)
- Housing Financing Bank Limited v Silk Events Limited and Another (Civil Appeal No. 0300 of 2021)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.