Shariff and Another v Gaga (Civil Appeal No. 5 of 1952)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Rent Control Board has no power to review its own decision after a full hearing on the merits. Once a tribunal has given a decision it becomes functus officio and in the absence of express legislative provision has no power to review and set aside its decision. No such provision exists in the Increase of Rent, etc., Ordinance. Further, no appeal lies against an order of the Board setting aside its previous decision as such an order is not a determination within the meaning of section 7 of the Ordinance.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Facts
In December 1951, the Rent Control Board heard an application by two landlords jointly for possession of premises from a tenant on grounds of non-payment of rent. Both parties were represented by advocates. After hearing evidence and argument, the Board made an order for possession and payment of arrears of rent. In January 1952, the tenant applied to the Board to review and set aside its decision on the ground that one of the landlords had died before the decision was given. The Board heard arguments from advocates for both parties and on 24 January 1952 made an order setting aside its previous decision. The landlords appealed.
Issues
- Whether the Rent Control Board has power to review its own decision after a full hearing on the merits.
- Whether an appeal lies against an order of the Board setting aside its previous decision.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Increase of Rent, etc., Ordinance s.7
- Increase of Rent, etc., Ordinance s.9
Cases cited (4)
- Arjan Singh Virdee v Mechani and Others (Civil Appeal No. 378 of 1951)
- Gujerat Commercial Corporation v. Laxman Doss and Others. 25 (1) K.L.R. 101
- Sheikh Noordin Mohamed v. Sheikh Bros., Ltd., 18 E.A.C.A. 42
- Gujerat Commercial Corporation v Laxman Dass and Another (Civil Appeal No. 539 of 1951)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.