Shumuk Springs Development (SSL) Ltd v Muyinza Joseph Bunoli and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 3090 PF 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted the applicant leave to amend the plaint in Civil Suit No. 342 of 2023 and add the 3rd and 4th respondents as parties. The court found that the presence of the 3rd and 4th respondents was necessary for proper determination of the dispute. The 4th respondent did not oppose the application.
Outcome
Leave to amend plaint and add parties granted; matter to proceed with amended pleadings
Facts
The applicant, Shumuk Springs Development (SSL) Ltd, brought a miscellaneous application arising from Civil Suit No. 342 of 2023 seeking leave to amend the plaint and add the 3rd and 4th respondents (Kamukama Edwin Ndebesa and Equity Bank) as parties. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents were served but did not appear. The 4th respondent filed an affidavit in reply and did not oppose the application. The applicant proceeded exparte against the absent respondents.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the plaint in Civil Suit No. 342 of 2023 and add the 3rd and 4th respondents as parties to the case.
Orders
- Application granted.
- Applicant granted leave to amend the Plaint in Civil Suit No. 342 of 2023 and add the 3rd and 4th Respondents as parties to the case.
- Amendment to be done within 15 days from 19 June 2025.
- Costs in the cause.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.