Sietco v Noble Builders (U) Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 31 of 1995)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a contractor who substantially performs a lump-sum building contract may recover the contract price despite minor defects or omissions.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Sietco applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.