Sir John Bageire v Ausi Matovu (Civil Appeal 7 of 1996)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against a High Court order cancelling the appellant's special certificate of title. The court found no real likelihood of bias on the trial judge's part, as the record showed counsel had been given ample opportunity to participate, and the alleged applications for stay had never been placed before the court. On the bona fide purchaser plea, the court held the onus lay on the defendant to establish purchase for value and lack of notice of fraud; the appellant's failure to call the alleged seller and the advocate who drew the sale agreement left a fatal gap. Buyers of land must make thorough investigations of both the land and seller before purchase.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court order cancelling the appellant's certificate of title and reinstating the respondent as registered owner stands
Facts
In 1968 the respondent, Ausi Matovu, purchased 95 acres of land at Bweya (Lutembe Beach), registering it as Busiru Block 397 Plot 185 and obtaining a certificate of title. In 1969 he leased the land to three Asians for 49 years. In 1972 the lessees left Uganda following the expulsion of Asians, and the Government took over the property, handing it to the Custodian Board. While the lessees were abroad, the Registrar of Titles cancelled the respondent's certificate and issued a special certificate in the appellant's name. The appellant claimed he had bought the land from a different person named 'Ausi Matovu' who executed a transfer. When the lessees returned in 1993 and obtained a certificate of repossession under the Expropriated Properties Act, the transfer transactions came to light. The respondent sued alleging fraud. The trial judge found the transfer was fraudulently effected, that fraud was brought home to the appellant, and ordered cancellation of the special certificate and reinstatement of the respondent as owner.
Issues
- Whether the trial judge was biased against the appellant by refusing to hear or entertain various applications made by the appellant's counsel.
- Whether the trial judge erred by proceeding with the suit despite an alleged pending appeal and refusing to allow counsel to address the court.
- Whether the trial judge erred in not holding that the appellant was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of fraud.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Costs of the appeal and in the court below awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (4)
- R v Nailsworth Licensing Justices, Ex parte Bird [1953] 2 All ER 652
- R v Taylor etc JJ & Laidler. Exparte Vogwill 14 TLR 185
- Metropolitan Properties Co (FGC) Ltd v Lannon [1969] 1 QB 577
- David Sejjaka Nalima v Rebecca Musoke (Civil Appeal No. 12 of 1985)
Cases citing this judgment (15)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Mushabe Solomon v Namugambe Ritah (Civil Suit 572 of 2025)
- James Segawa v Teddy Nalubwama (Civil Appeal No. 112 of 2021)
- Kemigisa v Kabasinguzi and Another (HCT-01-LD-CA-0008-2025)
- Senyonjo Dick v Delta Petroleum (Uganda) Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 181 of 2023)
- Mutumba Ismael v Appollo Mushabe and Another (Civil Suit No. 23 of 2020)
- Cheptoris Judith v Sande Alex and Another (Civil Appeal No. 142 of 2024)
- Centenary Rural Development Bank Limited v Alikanjero and Others v Kagga and Others (Civil Suit No. 0171 of 2019)
- Mwesigye Isha Evans and Another v Tebagalika Kasirye G.W. and Others (Civil Suit No. 875 of 2019)
- Masette & Another v Khainza (Civil Appeal 171 of 2022)
- Namayega v Etot & 2 Others (Civil Suit 939 of 2019)
- Namayega Barbra v Etot Denis and Others (Civil Suit No. 939 OF 2019)
- Kabuubi & Another v Kashaya & 3 others (Civil Suit 385 of 2020)
- Namazzi and 2 Others v Ndiwalana and Another (Civil Suit 301 of 2018)
- Nassanga and 2 Others v Kibahiganira and 4 Others (Civil Suit No. 94 of 2008)
- Nassanga and 2 Others v Kibahiganira and 4 Others (Civil Suit No. 94 of 2008)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.