Slowey Shauna Sutton v Nigel Sutton (Divorce Cause No. 63 of 2013)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw her divorce petition but ordered her to pay costs to the respondent who had filed a defence and incurred expenses. The court held that the respondent's cross petition remains valid despite the petitioner's change of domicile, as the cross petitioner was domiciled in Uganda when the cross petition was filed under Divorce Act s.1. The court declined to allow the cross petition at that stage, ruling that it should be addressed at a full hearing.
Outcome
Petition withdrawn with costs to respondent; cross petition remains pending for hearing
Facts
The petitioner filed a divorce petition against the respondent. The respondent filed a defence and a cross petition. When the matter was called for hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had left Uganda and was no longer domiciled there, making it expensive for her to attend trial. The petitioner sought to withdraw her petition. The respondent did not object to the withdrawal but sought costs and asked the court to allow his cross petition given the petitioner's inability to return to Uganda. The court granted leave to withdraw but deferred decisions on costs and the cross petition.
Issues
- Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the divorce petition.
- Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent following withdrawal of the petition.
- Whether the cross petition should be allowed in the petitioner's absence given her change of domicile.
Orders
- Leave granted to the petitioner to withdraw the petition against the respondent.
- Petition withdrawn with costs to the respondent.
- Cross petition to stand and be addressed at hearing.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.