Wakilii

SRS (U) Ltd v Aziz Ismail (Civil Suit No. 20 of 2011)

High Court · [2014] UGCOMMC 16 · 2014 Judgment for Plaintiff AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance civil suit for breach of tenancy agreement heard ex parte after defendant failed to appear
Decision
Judgment entered for plaintiff with damages and interest awarded

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 2 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 2 times with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that where a person signs a contract on behalf of a non-existent entity without disclosing that it is a limited company, that person is presumed to have contracted personally and is personally liable under the agreement. The defendant breached the tenancy agreement by failing to pay rent and VAT for October to December 2010 and VAT for August to September 2010. Special damages of US$ 13,650 awarded for unpaid rent, nominal damages of UGX 3,000,000 awarded, and interest at 10% per annum on special damages from judgment until payment in full.

Outcome

Judgment entered for plaintiff with damages and interest awarded

Facts

On 15 December 2008, the plaintiff entered into a tenancy agreement with the defendant for premises at Plot 15 Cooper Road, Kisementi for two years at US$ 3,500 per month plus VAT. The agreement was signed by Aziz Ismail for Pavement Tandoori. The defendant paid rent from January 2009 to July 2010. In September 2010, the defendant paid US$ 7,000 for July and August 2010 rent arrears pursuant to a certificate to levy distress. The defendant then failed to pay rent for October to December 2010 and failed to pay VAT for August to September 2010. The defendant raised a defence that the plaintiff contracted with Pavement Café & Bar-beque Limited (Pavement Tandoori), a different entity, but admitted making rental payments. A search at the Uganda Registration Services Bureau showed that Pavement Tandoori (the name on the agreement) was not an incorporated entity. The matter proceeded ex parte after the defendant failed to appear at trial.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant breached the tenancy agreement.
  2. What remedies are available to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • US$ 13,650 be paid by the defendant as special damages.
  • UGX 3,000,000 be paid by the defendant as nominal damages.
  • Interest of 10% per annum is awarded on the special damages from date of judgment till payment in full.
  • Costs of the suit are awarded to the plaintiff.

Rules and key headnotes

Company Law — Personal Liability — Contracting on Behalf of Non-Existent Entity
Where a person signs a contract purporting to act on behalf of a principal and the principal is a fictitious or non-existent entity, that person is presumed to have intended to contract personally and is personally liable on the contract, particularly where the person failed to indicate that the principal was a limited liability company.
Contract Law — Breach of Contract — Failure to Pay Rent
Breach of contract is the breaking of an obligation which a contract imposes, conferring a right of action for damages on the injured party. Failure to pay rent as stipulated in a tenancy agreement constitutes breach of contract.
Contract Law — Damages — Special Damages — Proof Requirements
Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved. Where the amount claimed is not supported by evidence adduced at trial, the court will award only the amount proved on a balance of probabilities based on the witness testimony and documentary evidence.
Contract Law — Damages — Nominal Damages
A plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages where his rights have been infringed but he has not sustained any actual damage from the infringement or fails to prove that he has. Nominal damages may be awarded where no evidence is led to support a claim for general damages.
Contract Law — Interest — Rate of Interest on Foreign Currency Awards
Where the principal sum awarded is in United States Dollars, an interest rate of 25% per annum would be unconscionable. A lower rate of 10% per annum is appropriate for interest on special damages denominated in foreign currency.

Cases cited (7)

  • Penrose vs Martyr (EB & E 499)/ 28 L.J QB 28
  • Nassu Stream Press vs Tyler and Others (1894) 7 L.T 376
  • Alimadhi Osman v Mombasa Salt Works Ltd & another (HCMA No. 157 of 2001)
  • British India General Insurance Company Limited v Mohanlul Solanki (Civil Appeal No. 30 of 1997)
  • Ronald Kasibante v Shell Uganda Ltd (HCCS No. 542 of 2006)
  • Thunderbolt Technical Services Ltd v Apedu & Another (HCCS No. 340 of 2009)
  • Sietco v Noble Builders (SCCA No. 31 of 1995)

Cases citing this judgment (2)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

SRS (U) Ltd v Aziz Ismail (Civil Suit No. 20 of 2011) [2014] UGCommC 16 (13 February 2014)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.