Ssekiranda ( Administrator of the Estate of the late Kalyango) v Sseluwa and Another (Civil Suit No. 687 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the 1st defendant fraudulently registered himself on the suit land using forged letters of administration. The High Court Family Division confirmed the letters were a forgery, issued under a different administration cause. The 1st defendant intermeddled with the estate by using forged documents to obtain registration as administrator. Registration cancelled and register rectified to reflect the lawful administrators. General damages of UGX 50,000,000 awarded.
Outcome
Judgment entered for the plaintiff with cancellation of fraudulent registration, rectification of the register in favour of lawful administrators, permanent injunction against the 1st defendant, and general damages of UGX 50,000,000 awarded
Facts
The plaintiff's father, Kalyango Lauben, died intestate in 1978 leaving land measuring 10 acres comprised in Busiro Block 106 Plot 39 at Mulume, Masuliita, Wakiso. The plaintiff and Charles Lubowa, as surviving children, applied for and obtained letters of administration to the estate in 2009. The 1st defendant, the plaintiff's nephew and grandson to the deceased, obtained a special certificate of title by presenting forged letters of administration purporting to have been issued by the High Court under Administration Cause No. 698 of 2017. The High Court Family Division confirmed that Administration Cause No. 698 of 2017 concerned a different deceased (Ssebugwawo Kalooli) and different applicants, and that the letters presented by the 1st defendant were a forgery. Using the fraudulent registration, the 1st defendant subdivided the land into plots for sale. The defendants did not file a defence despite being duly served.
Issues
- Whether the 1st defendant's registration of himself on land comprised in Busiro Block 106 Plot 39 at Mulume was fraudulent and illegal.
- Whether the 1st defendant did intermeddle with the estate of the late Kalyango Lauben.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- The 1st defendant's registration on the certificate of title of the suit land comprised in Busiro Block 106 Plot 39 at Mulume Masulita Wakiso was fraudulent and illegal.
- The 1st defendant's actions in respect of the estate of the late Kalyango Lauben amounted to intermeddling with the said deceased's estate.
- The 2nd defendant is to cancel all the entries by which the 1st defendant became registered on the suit land.
- The 2nd defendant is to rectify the register by registering Lubowa Charles (Son) and Ssekiranda Benon (the Plaintiff/son) (holders of letters of administration to the said estate) as the Administrators of the estate of the late Kalyango Lauben.
- A permanent injunction is issued against the 1st defendant from holding himself out as the registered proprietor of the suit land.
- The 1st defendant is to pay the plaintiff fifty million shillings (50,000,000/=) as general damages for intermeddling with the estate of the late Kalyango Lauben.
- The Plaintiff is to file a criminal case at the Police against the 1st defendant for forgery of a judicial document.
- The 1st defendant is to pay the costs of this suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (1)
- Behangana Domaro and Another v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 53 of 2010)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.