Sserubiri Israel and Lule David Mukomazi v Administrator General (Miscellaneous Application No. 1975 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court dispensed with the requirement for a certificate of no objection from the Administrator General and granted letters of administration to the applicants. Where the Administrator General fails to respond within fourteen days to a notice of intention to apply for letters of administration, the court may dispense with the certificate requirement under section 5 of the Administrator General's Act. Beneficiaries cannot be required to await the outcome of a constitutional petition before protecting their interests in an estate.
Outcome
Letters of administration granted to applicants without certificate of no objection from Administrator General
Facts
The applicants, grandchildren of the late Temitewo Mukomazi who died intestate in 1917, sought letters of administration to his estate. They had previously obtained letters of administration to their father's estate (Lauben Lwanga) but discovered that land remained registered in their grandfather's name. The applicants opened a file with the Administrator General in the early 2000s but the Administrator General declined to issue a certificate of no objection. On 5 January 2021, the applicants issued formal notice to the Administrator General of their intention to apply for letters of administration. The Administrator General did not respond within fourteen days or thereafter. The Administrator General opposed the application on grounds that the estate had been distributed under Buganda customary law and that a pending constitutional petition questioned the Administrator General's authority to issue certificates of no objection on succession register estates. The applicants contended that the estate had not been properly administered, that land remained in the deceased's name, and that the estate was vulnerable to fraudsters.
Issues
- Whether the requirement for a certificate of no objection from the Administrator General for administering the estate of the late Temitewo Mukomazi should be dispensed with.
- Whether letters of administration for the estate should be granted to the applicants.
Orders
- The requirement for a Certificate of No Objection from the Administrator General for the estate of the late Temitewo Mukomazi is dispensed with.
- Letters of Administration for the estate of the late Temitewo Mukomazi are granted to the applicants.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- Administrator General's Act Cap 264 s.5
- Judicature Act Cap 16 s.37
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 Rules 1 and 3
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.98
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.21
- Land Succession Law 1912
- Local Administration Act SI No. 150 of 1967
Cases cited (1)
- Lufunya Derrick and Another v Attorney General and Another (Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.