Sserunkuma v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 8 of 1989)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 2 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that where identification fails, an accused's recent possession of stolen property with no reasonable explanation supports an inference of theft, not receiving.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Sserunkuma applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.