Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited v Dahable Uganda Limited & Another (Miscellaneous Application 93 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that where a mortgagor defaults and fails to redeem mortgaged property, the mortgagee is entitled to foreclosure and vacant possession. The Mortgage Act provides the mortgagee with the option of taking possession until default is rectified or until the power of sale is exercised. Sale must proceed by public auction unless the mortgagor consents to private treaty, to protect the mortgagor's equity by ensuring competitive bidding. Application granted. Foreclosure ordered.
Outcome
Foreclosure granted. Respondents ordered to deliver vacant possession to the applicant bank, with sale to proceed by public auction
Facts
Stanbic Bank advanced banking facilities totalling UGX 9,800,000,000 to Dahable Uganda Limited under three facility letters between May 2021 and August 2022. The facilities were guaranteed by Mohamed Omar Sheikh and secured by legal mortgages over four properties in Arua, Wakiso and Iganga Districts. Dahable Uganda Limited defaulted on its payment obligations. As at 29 August 2023 the outstanding amount was UGX 7,132,879,566, continuing to attract contractual interest. The bank issued a Notice of Default on 30 January 2023 and a Notice of Sale on 20 April 2023. On 24 July 2023 when the bank attempted to exercise its power of sale as legal mortgagee, the respondents refused to hand over vacant possession of the mortgaged properties. The bank applied for foreclosure and vacant possession. The respondents did not file an affidavit in reply or appear at the hearing.
Issues
- Whether the applicant bank as mortgagee was entitled to an order for foreclosure of the mortgaged properties.
- Whether the applicant was entitled to an order for vacant possession of the mortgaged properties.
- Whether sale of the foreclosed properties should proceed by public auction or private treaty.
Orders
- The right, title and equity of redemption of the respondents to and in the mortgaged properties comprised in LRV ARM F01.101 Block 3 Plot 731, Ayivu County, Arua District; LRV WAN 5434 Folio 24 Busiro Block 401 Plot 1856 Kikusa Wakiso District; JJA411 Folio 6 Plot 84 Bunya Road Buligo South Iganga District; and LRV WAK 4887 Folio 16 Plot 285 Busiro Block 336 Lwekobaja Wakiso District is foreclosed.
- Sale of the mortgaged properties shall be by public auction in accordance with the Mortgage Act 2009 and Mortgage Regulations 2012.
- The respondents shall forthwith deliver to the applicant possession of the mortgaged properties or such part as is in their possession, failing which possession may be obtained by eviction.
- Costs of the application to be incorporated in the costs of recovery of the outstanding sum.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (10)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature Act s.33
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.8(1)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.25(c)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.25(d)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.28(1)(d)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.28(2)
- Mortgage Act 2009 s.32
- Mortgage Act 2009 Part V
- Mortgage Regulations 2012 reg.8(1)
Cases citing this judgment (5)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Auto One Spares & Accessories Ltd v Equity Bank Uganda Ltd (Civil Suit No. 653 of 2023)
- Auto One Spares & Accessories Ltd v Equity Bank Uganda Ltd (Civil Suit No. 653 of 2023)
- Orishaba v Ngobi (Miscellaneous Application 49 of 2023)
- Salabaya & Another v Sekitooleko & Another (Civil Suit 293 of 2014)
- Salabaya and Another v Sekitoleko Mugwanya and Another (Civil Suit 293 of 2014)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.