Wakilii

Standard Chartered Bank Limited v Anzeti Grismus (Civil Suit 351 of 2022)

High Court · [2026] UGCOMMC 245 · 2026 Judgment for Plaintiff AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance civil suit for recovery of loan arrears
Decision
Judgment entered for the plaintiff for UGX 75,587,378/= with interest at 16.9% per annum from 24 September 2021 until payment in full and costs

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that the defendant's termination from MONUSCO constituted retrenchment, not mere contract expiry, and was covered by the loan insurance policy. The insurance covered only 12 monthly installments out of 40 outstanding installments. The defendant remained liable for the balance of UGX 75,587,378/= plus contractual interest at 16.9% per annum from the date of default. Judgment entered for the plaintiff for the reduced sum with interest and costs.

Outcome

Judgment entered for the plaintiff for UGX 75,587,378/= with interest at 16.9% per annum from 24 September 2021 until payment in full and costs

Facts

The defendant obtained a personal unsecured loan of UGX 140,000,000/= from the plaintiff bank on 18 August 2018, repayable over 72 months at 16.9% interest per annum. The defendant was employed by MONUSCO on a fixed-term contract. He paid 33 monthly installments and then defaulted from 24 September 2021. The defendant was retrenched by MONUSCO effective 30 June 2021 following a Comparative Review Process that resulted in staff reductions. The loan was covered by credit life insurance with Sanlam Life Insurance Limited, which included retrenchment cover limited to 12 monthly installments. The plaintiff sued for recovery of UGX 103,396,606/=. The defendant contended that the insurance should cover the full outstanding balance. The court found that 40 installments remained outstanding after the defendant's default, of which 12 were covered by insurance, leaving 28 installments unpaid.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of UGX 103,396,606/= from the defendant.
  2. What remedies are available to the parties?

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff.
  • Defendant to pay UGX 75,587,378/=.
  • Interest at 16.9% per annum from 24 September 2021 until payment in full.
  • Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiff.

Rules and key headnotes

Banking & Finance — Loan Recovery — Credit Life Insurance — Scope of Retrenchment Cover
Where a loan agreement is covered by credit life insurance that includes retrenchment cover, the scope of that cover is determined by the terms of the insurance policy. If the policy limits retrenchment cover to a specified number of monthly installments, the borrower remains liable for any balance exceeding that limit.
Contract Law — Loan Agreements — Breach — Liability for Outstanding Balance
A borrower who defaults on loan repayments after partial coverage by insurance remains in breach of the loan agreement and is liable to pay the outstanding principal sum plus contractual interest from the date of default.
Employment & Labour — Retrenchment — Definition — Distinction from Contract Expiry
Retrenchment means termination of employment for operational requirements of the employer, including economic, technological, or structural needs. Where an employee's fixed-term contract is not renewed following a staff reduction program and comparative review process, this constitutes retrenchment, not mere contract expiry.

Legislation cited (1)

Cases cited (2)

  • Piprainch Sugar Mills v Piprainch Sugar Mills Mazdoor Union AIR (1957) SC 95
  • Aporo George Goldie v Mercy Corps Uganda (Labour Dispute Reference No. 14 of 2021)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Standard Chartered Bank Limited v Anzeti Grismus (Civil Suit 351 of 2022) [2026] UGCommC 245 (8 April 2026)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.