Stephen Kalani v Satwant Kaur [1996] UGSC 16
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a lease surrendered before departure left no interest to vest in Government, so the Expropriated Properties Act did not apply and the repossession certificate was cancelled.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Stephen Kalani applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.